The Determination of Development Priorities Road Infrastructure at Dinas Pekerjaaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang Kabupaten Balangan Using AHP and Bayes Methods

  • Haderiansyah Haderiansyah (1*) Teknologi Informasi, Institut Teknologi Sapta Mandiri
  • Deni Mahdiiana (2) Magister Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Budi Luhur
  • Ade Davy Wiranata (3) Teknik Informatika, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA
  • Mirza Sutrisno (4) Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Decision Support System, DSS, AHP, Bayes


Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang (PUPR) Kabupaten Balangan is a Regional Government Organization Unit (SOPD) that has the task of assisting the Bupati in administering government affairs in public works, infrastructure, and housing development. In addition, it also formulates, determines, and implements policies in the field of water resources management, road management, housing provision and development of residential areas, infrastructure financing, structuring of buildings, drinking water supply systems, wastewater management systems, and environmental drainage and waste, and construction services construction. Difficulty in determining priorities for infrastructure development on the Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang Kabupaten Balangan, then an Infrastructure Development Priority Analysis system was created to support the construction of roads and bridges on Kabupaten Balangan. To determine the priority development weights using the AHP method and the order of priorities using the Bayes method because it is one of the techniques used to analyze the best decision-making from several alternatives to produce optimal gains. The results of the completed questionnaire get an average yield of 21 (twenty-one) or 87.5% (eighty-seven point five percent). If the average is included in the rating scale, get a VS rating or Very Satisfied. Decision support systems using AHP and Bayes methods can determine the priority of road infrastructure development at Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang Kabupaten Balangan.


Download data is not yet available.


Arango, E., Santamaria, M., Nogal, M., Sousa, H. S., & Matos, J. C. (2022). Flood Risk Assessment for Road Infrastructures Using Bayesian Networks: Case Study of Santarem - Portugal. Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings, 36, 33–46.

Belay, S., Goedert, J., Woldesenbet, A., & Rokooei, S. (2022). AHP-based multi-criteria decision analysis of success factors to enhance decision-making in infrastructure construction projects. Cogent Engineering, 9(1).

Chen, C. Y., & Huang, J. J. (2023). Integrating Dynamic Bayesian Networks and Analytic Hierarchy Process for Time-Dependent Multi-Criteria Decision-Making. Mathematics, 11(10).

Endi Pratista, W., & Gde Ariastita, P. (2013). Penentuan Infrastruktur Prioritas Di Wilayah Pinggiran Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 2(2), 178–182. Retrieved from

Kartikasari, D., Sitorus, S. R. P., & Soma, S. (2017). Analisis Jaringan Jalan Dan Arahan Prioritas Penanganannya Di Kabupaten Purworejo, Provinsi Jawa Tengah (IPB University). Retrieved from

Marimin, M. (2004). Teknik dan Aplikasi Pengambilan Keputusan Kriteria Majemuk.

Mimović, P., Stanković, J., & Milić, V. J. (2015). Decision-making under uncertainty - The integrated approach of the AHP and Bayesian analysis. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja , 28(1), 868–878.

Nugraha, A. T., Prayitno, G., Situmorang, M. E., & Nasution, A. (2020). The role of infrastructure in economic growth and income inequality in Indonesia. Economics and Sociology, 13(1), 102–115.

Pratiwi, H. (2016). Buku Ajar : Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Sarvari, H., Chan, D. W. M., Alaeos, A. K. F., Olawumi, T. O., & Abdalridah Aldaud, A. A. (2021). Critical success factors for managing construction small and medium-sized enterprises in developing countries of Middle East: Evidence from Iranian construction enterprises. Journal of Building Engineering, 43(May), 103152.

Shyamprasad, V., & Kousalya, P. (2020). Role of Consistency and Random Index in Analytic Hierarchy Process—A New Measure. Numerical Optimization in Engineering and Sciences. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 979, 233–239.

Sigalingging, H., Handiwidjojo, W., & Oslan, Y. (2013). Implementasi Metode Naïve Bayes Untukpengkategorian Calon Peserta KKN Studi Kasus : Calon Peserta KKN Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana. Jurnal EKSIS, 6(1), 16–26. Retrieved from

Srinivasu, B., & Srinivasa Rao, P. (2013). Infrastructure Development and Economic growth: Prospects and Perspective. Journal of Business Management & Social Sciences Research, 2(1), 2319–5614.

Sulistyowati, D., & Wibowo, P. (2022). Infrastructure Spending in the Characteristics of the Regions: Towards the Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 25(03), 319–358.

Sutrisno, M., & Budiyanto, U. (2019). Intelligent System for Recommending Study Level in English Language Course Using CBR Method. 2019 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI), 153–158.

Taherdoost, H. (2018). Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); Step by Step Approach. International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, (February).

Tonny, J., & Wulan, P. (2020). Determining priority infrastructure provision for supporting agrotourism development using AHP method. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 830(2).

Warsilan, W., & Noor, A. (2015). Peranan Infrastruktur terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Implikasi pada Kebijakan Pembangunan di Kota Samarinda. MIMBAR, 31(2), 359–366.

How to Cite
Haderiansyah, H., Mahdiiana, D., Wiranata, A., & Sutrisno, M. (2023). The Determination of Development Priorities Road Infrastructure at Dinas Pekerjaaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang Kabupaten Balangan Using AHP and Bayes Methods. Jurnal Riset Informatika, 5(3), 393-400.
Article Metrics

Abstract viewed = 75 times
PDF downloaded = 38 times

Most read articles by the same author(s)