EXAMINING STUDENTS' BEHAVIORAL USE OF CAMPUS JOURNALS WITH THE TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL APPROACH

Authors

  • Agus Pratama W Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen dan Ilmu Komputer Widuri
  • Asrul Sani Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen dan Ilmu Komputer Widuri
  • Siti Aisyah Politeknik Negeri Media Kreatif
  • Merliani Ivone S STISIP Widuri
  • Agus Budiyantara Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen dan Ilmu Komputer Widuri
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34288/jri.v4i2.158

Keywords:

Behavior, TAM, Student, Evaluation

Abstract

Understudy conduct is an action completed by understudies for every person. Students who visit campus journal websites are essential in terms of journal accreditation aspects, where this is a benchmark for increasing the journal's potential as a reference. However, some factors influence it where the frequency of students visiting campus journal websites is not as expected in exploring journals, and the enthusiasm of students to download articles is still below the desired expectations. It causes the potential for the journal to obtain national accreditation at a small percentage, and students may think that there are very few reference sources for journals, so it is less attractive on the campus journal website system. Data collection methods were used in this study, such as interviews, literature study, and questionnaires.

Meanwhile, evaluate the campus journal website system on student behavior using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with four variables: perceived ease of use, usefulness, attitude toward using, and behavioral intention to use. This method makes the user feel it is easier to access the campus journal website; then, the user feels the campus journal website can provide benefits and usability. The user has a great curiosity about accessing the campus journal, and finally, the user wants to access the website and take the initiative to influence. other users in to access the same

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. In 5th (Ed.), Research design. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Research+design+-+Qualitative,+Quantitative,+and+mixed+methods+approaches#0

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Djatikusuma, E. S., & Widagdo, H. (2015). Analisa Perilaku Calon Mahasiswa Terhadap Minat Untuk Menjadi Mahasiswa Di Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Multi Data Palembang Menggunakan Metode. Forum Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan Jurnal Ilmiah STIE MDP, 46(55), 5–1. Retrieved from http://forbiswira.stie-mdp.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/46Edin-dan-Herry.pdf

Drakel, W. J., Pratiknjo, M. H., & Mulianti, T. (2018). Perilaku mahasiswa dalam menggunakan media sosial di Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado. HOLISTIK, Journal Of Social and Culture, 11(21A), 1–20. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/holistik/article/view/20559

Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864

Harahap, A. H., & Pasaribu, I. M. (2018). Layanan Pemustaka Terhadap Tingkat Kunjungan Pada Perpustakaan Universitas Tjut Nyak Dhien Medan. Journal Net. Library and Information, 1(1), 30–39. Retrieved from http://e-journal.sari-mutiara.ac.id/index.php/jnli/article/view/272

Pusparini, N. N., & Sani, A. (2020). Mengukur Keberhasilan Penerapan Sistem Informasi Akademik Dengan Model Kesuksesan Delon And Mclean. METHOMIKA: Jurnal Manajemen Informatika & Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 4(2), 149–155. Retrieved from https://ejurnal.methodist.ac.id/index.php/methomika/article/view/216

Salloum, S. A., & Al-Emran, M. (2018). Factors affecting the adoption of E-payment systems by university students: Extending the TAM with trust. International Journal of Electronic Business, 14(4), 371–390. Retrieved from https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJEB.2018.098130

Salloum, S. A., Alhamad, A. Q. M., Al-Emran, M., Monem, A. A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Exploring students' acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model. IEEE Access, 7, 128445–128462. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467

Sani, A., Wiliani, N., Budiyantara, A., & Nawaningtyas, N. (2020). Pengembangan Model Adopsi Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Model Penerimaan Teknologi Diantara Umkm. JITK (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi Komputer), 5(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.33480/jitk.v5i2.1055

Sayoto, S., & Daryono, D. (2019). Analisis Dampak Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Pendidikan Pancasila terhadap Perilaku Mahasiswa (Studi Kasus di Kampus Universitas Semarang). Forum Ilmu Sosial, 46(1), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.15294/FIS.V46I1.21169

Schafer, J. A., Lee, C., Burruss, G. W., & Giblin, M. J. (2018). College Student Perceptions of Campus Safety Initiatives. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(4), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403416631804

Silva, P. (2015). Davis' technology acceptance model (TAM)(1989). In M. N. Al-Suqri & A. S. Al-Aufi (Eds.), Information seeking behavior and technology adoption: Theories and trends (2015) (pp. 205–219). Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global's. Retrieved from https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/davis-technology-acceptance-model-tam-1989/127133

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Bisnis, Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatiff, Kombinasi, dan R&D (3rd ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta. Retrieved from https://cvalfabeta.com/product/metode-penelitian-bisnis-pendekatan-kuantitatif-kualitatiff-kombinasi-dan-rd/

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D – MPKK (1st ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta. Retrieved from https://cvalfabeta.com/product/metode-penelitian-kuantitatif-kualitatif-dan-rd-mpkk/

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. Retrieved from https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Downloads

Published

2022-03-24

How to Cite

Pratama W, A., Sani, A., Aisyah, S., Ivone S, M., & Budiyantara, A. (2022). EXAMINING STUDENTS’ BEHAVIORAL USE OF CAMPUS JOURNALS WITH THE TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL APPROACH. Jurnal Riset Informatika, 4(2), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.34288/jri.v4i2.158

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)