Comparison of SAW, WP, and TOPSIS Methods in Determining the Best Journalists

  • N.I.S. Baldanullah (1*) Universitas Pancasila
  • Febrianti Adhania (2) Universitas Pancasila
  • Desti Fitriati (3) Universitas Pancasila

  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Decision Support System, SAW Method, WP Method, TOPSIS Method

Abstract

Journalists are human resources that have a significant influence on journalistic companies. A system is needed to support the company's decision to select and measure its reporters. PT. Inipasti Communika is one of the journalistic companies that has never previously measured and assessed its journalists, so it has difficulty assessing and measuring its journalists. This study aims to provide a solution using the Decision Support System in decision-making using the SAW, WP, and TOPSIS methods and provide the final decision results based on comparing these methods. This study uses criteria and criteria values from these companies. The company's data related to its journalists is the privacy of PT. It is a Community, so the alternative value used is dummy data that is still by the original standards of the company's data. This study concludes that the three methods can provide the best alternatives with the same results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aisyah, N., & Putra, A. S. (2021). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Pemilihan Manajer Terbaik Menggunakan Metode AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). Jurnal Esensi Infokom, 5 (2), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.55886/infokom.v5i2.275

Hafiz, A., & Ma’mur, M. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik dengan Pendekatan Weighted Product. Jurnal Cendikia, 15(1), 23–28. http://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=936421&val=14485&title=sistem%20pendukung%20keputusan%20pemilihan%20karyawan%20terbaik%20dengan%20pendekatan%20weighted%20product

Hermanto, & Izzah, N. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Motor dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). JurnalMatematika dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 184-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.33477/mp.v6i2.669

Hutasuhut, B. K., Batubara, H. I., & Sari, P. I. (2021). Analisa Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan KosentrasiMatakuliah Pilihan Menggunakan Metode Topsis. INFOTEKJAR:Jurnal Nasional Informatika dan Teknologi Jaringan, 6(1), 111–114. https://doi.org/10.30743/infotekjar.v6i1.3930

Kungkung, A. Y., & Haryadi Kiswanto, R. 2018. Analisa Perbandingan Metode SAW, WP dan TOPSIS Menggunakan Hamming Distance. Konferensi Nasional Sistem Informasi, STMIK Atma Luhur Pangkalpinang, 8 –9 Maret 2018, 836-841. http://jurnal.atmaluhur.ac.id/index.php/knsi2018/article/view/458

Noval, Q., Handrianto, Y., & Supendar, H. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Karyawan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting. In Jurnal 2(1), http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/infortech116

Novira, S. T., Mubarok, H., & Shofa, R. N. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Jurusan dengan menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process dan Weighted Product (Studi Kasus: SMK Al-Khoeriyah Kota Tasikmalaya). Scientific Articles of Informatics Students, 3(2), 111–122. https://publikasi.unsil.ac.id/index.php/sais

Rani, M., Ardiansyah, R., & Christina, D. (2021). Sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan supplier cosmetic dengan metode weighted product. JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia), 6(1), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.29210/3003848000

Rizal, C., Siregar, S. R., Supiyandi, S., Armasari, S., & Karim, A. (2021). Penerapan Metode Weighted Product (WP) Dalam Keputusan Rekomendasi Pemilihan Manager Penjualan. Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS), 3(3), 312–316. https://doi.org/10.47065/bits.v3i3.1094

Salim, A., Lubis, B. O., & Haidir, A. (2022). Penentuan Karyawan Terbaik Dengan Metode Topsis Pada PT. Regency Motor. Jurnal Sains, Teknologi, Komputer, dan Manajemen SAINTEKOM, 12(1), 92 – 102. https://doi.org/10.33020/saintekom.v12i1.203

Sihaloho, T. P., Sipayung, S. P., & Tarigan, W. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Dengan Metode Weighted Product (WP) Pada CV. Neosoft Art Medan. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 11(1), 1-8. DOI: 10.33395/jmp.v11i1.11459

Sugiarto, H. (2021). Penerapan Metode Topsis Untuk Pemilihan Perumahan. Jurnal Teknik Komputer AMIK BSI, 7(2), 176–180. https://doi.org/10.31294/jtk.v4i2

Supiyan, D. (2019). Perbandingan Metode SAW, WP dan TOPSIS dalam Penentuan Pembiayaan BMT El-Raushan. Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika, 4(2), 88 – 94. https://doi.org/10.35316/jimi.v4i2.544

Syarief, F. M. F., & Suwandana, S. (2018). Analisis dan Perancangan Decision Support System Menentukan Angkat Kredit dengan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) Pada Leasing OTO Finance Batam. JURSIMA: Jurnal Sistem Informasi Dan Manajemen, 6(1), https://doi.org/10.47024/js.v6i1.109

Wijaya, A. E., & Insan, P. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Anggota Baru Pecinta Alam Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) (Studi Kasus SMA Negeri 2 Subang). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi STMIK Subang, 11 (2), 132-146. https://jurnalstmiksubang.ac.id/index.php/jtik/article/view/133

Published
2022-12-14
How to Cite
Baldanullah, N., Adhania, F., & Fitriati, D. (2022). Comparison of SAW, WP, and TOPSIS Methods in Determining the Best Journalists. Jurnal Riset Informatika, 5(1), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.34288/jri.v5i1.493
Article Metrics

Abstract viewed = 51 times
PDF downloaded = 25 times

Most read articles by the same author(s)