A STUDY OF STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVES OF ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE METHODOLOGY (TOGAF FRAMEWORK)

  • Denada Fatimah Zahra (1*) STMIK LIKMI Bandung
  • Yunita Sinambela (2) STMIK-LIKMI Bandung
  • Ahsani Takwim (3) STMIK-LIKMI Bandung

  • (*) Corresponding Author

Keywords: Architecture Methodology, EA, TOGAF, FEAF, Stakeholder

Abstract

Enterprise architecture is a method or explanation of how to plan, compile, structure, and realize company structures, business processes, information systems, and related infrastructure as well as an explanation of how to design systems that can support business needs and related technology to make vision and mission achieve results. targeted. The framework used in this research is TOGAF and FEAF. TOGAF has a detailed and comprehensive framework and has a methodology that supports its application but is invincible from a stakeholder point of view. The aim of this study is to develop two frameworks by comparing the differences that each Framework has from the perspective of stakeholders. The research methodology begins with a literature study and analysis with a comparison of the TOGAF and FEAF Frameworks. The results showed that. The final result of this research is the TOGAF framework with the components that are owned by FEAF from the perspective of the stakeholders so as to produce a TOGAF framework that suits the specific needs of the organization

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hadiana, A. (2016). Perencanaan & Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Terpadu. Megatama : Bandung.

Harrison, R. (2018). Togaf(r) 9 Foundation Study Guide (4th ed.). Van Haren.

Kustiyahningsih, Y. (2013). Perencanaan Arsitektur Enterprise Menggunakan Metode Togaf Adm (Studi Kasus : Rsud Dr.Soegiri Lamongan). In Program Studi MMT-ITS (Ed.), Prosiding Seminar Nasional Manajemen Teknologi XVIII (pp. 1–8). Program Studi MMT-ITS. https://mmt.its.ac.id/download/SEMNAS/SEMNAS XVIII/MTI/17. Prosiding Yeni-Togaf-OK.pdf

Milani, F. P., & Veenpere, H. (2017). Comparing Enterprise Architecture Frameworks– A Case Study at the Estonian Rescue Board. 71. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe068114

Murti, D. N., Prasetyo, Y. A., & Fajrillah, A. A. N. (2017). Perancangan Enterprise Architecture Pada Fungsi Sumber Daya Manusia (SDM) Di Universitas Telkom Menggunakan Togaf ADM. Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem & Industri (JRSI), 4(01), 47. https://doi.org/10.25124/jrsi.v4i01.233

Perez-Castillo, R., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M., & Ebert, C. (2019). Enterprise Architecture. IEEE Software, 36(4), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2019.2909329

Pramudita, R., & Safitri, N. (2016). Integrasi Zachman Framework dan TOGAF ADM ( Architecture Development Method ). Information System for Educators and Professionals, 1(2), 157–166.

Purnasari, M., & Assegaff, S. (2018). Perancangan Arsitektur Sistem Informasi Menggunakan Togaf Adm Pada Sma Negeri 1 Muara Bungo. Jurnal Manajemen Sistem Informasi, 3(2), 1030–1041.

Setiawan, E. B. (2009). Pemilihan EA Framework. Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi (SNATI), 114–119. https://journal.uii.ac.id/Snati/article/view/1091

Tang, A., Han, J., & Chen, P. (2004). A comparative analysis of architecture frameworks. Proceedings - Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, APSEC, January, 640–647. https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2004.2

The Open Group. (2018). Welcome to the TOGAF® Standard, Version 9.2, a standard of The Open Group. Pubs.Opengroup.Org. https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/

Tuwondila, A. G., Sitokdana, M. N. N., & Wijaya, A. F. (2018). PERENCANAAN STRATEGIS SI/TI PEMERINTAHAN MENGGUNAKAN THE OPEN GROUP ARCHITECTURE FRAMEWORK (TOGAF). Seminar Nasional Sistem Informasi Indonesia (SESINDO), November, 79–84. http://is.its.ac.id/pubs/oajis/index.php/home/detail/1827/PERENCANAAN-STRATEGIS-SITI-PEMERINTAHAN-MENGGUNAKAN-THE-OPEN-GROUP-ARCHITECTURE-FRAMEWORK-TOGAF

Urbaczewski, L., & Mrdalj, S. (2006). a Comparison of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks. Issues in Information Systems, 7(2), 18–23. https://iacis.org/iis/2006/Urbaczewki_Mrdalj.pdf

Wartika, W., & Supriana, I. (2011). Analisis Perbandingan Komponen Dan Karakteristik Enterprise Architecture Framework. 2011 Konferensi Nasional Sistem Dan Informatika, 407–412. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259359209_ANALISIS_PERBANDINGAN_KOMPONEN_DAN_KARAKTERISTIK_ENTERPRISE_ARCHITECTURE_FRAMEWORK

Yunis, R., & Surendro, K. (2009). Model Enterprise Architecture Untuk Perguruan Tinggi di Indonesia. Seminar Nasional Informatika (SEMNASIF), I(5), E72–E79. http://jurnal.upnyk.ac.id/index.php/semnasif/article/view/909/0

Published
2020-09-01
How to Cite
Zahra, D., Sinambela, Y., & Takwim, A. (2020). A STUDY OF STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVES OF ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE METHODOLOGY (TOGAF FRAMEWORK). Jurnal Riset Informatika, 2(4), 179-184. https://doi.org/10.34288/jri.v2i4.151
Article Metrics

Abstract viewed = 138 times
PDF downloaded = 99 times